Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    37,170
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    As Obesity Fight Hits Cafeteria, Many Fear a Note From School
    January 8, 2007
    By JODI KANTOR, New York Times

    BLOSSBURG, Pa. ? Six-year-old Karlind Dunbar barely touched her dinner, but not for time-honored 6-year-old reasons. The pasta was not the wrong shape. She did not have an urgent date with her dolls.

    The problem was the letter Karlind discovered, tucked inside her report card, saying that she had a body mass index in the 80th percentile. The first grader did not know what ?index? or ?percentile? meant, or that children scoring in the 5th through 85th percentiles are considered normal, while those scoring higher are at risk of being or already overweight.

    Yet she became convinced that her teachers were chastising her for overeating.

    Since the letter arrived, ?my 2-year-old eats more than she does,? said Georgeanna Dunbar, Karlind?s mother, who complained to the school and is trying to help her confused child. ?She?s afraid she?s going to get in trouble,? Ms. Dunbar said.

    The practice of reporting students? body mass scores to parents originated a few years ago as just one tactic in a war on childhood obesity that would be fought with fresh, low-fat cafeteria offerings and expanded physical education. Now, inspired by impressive results in a few well-financed programs, states including Delaware, South Carolina and Tennessee have jumped on the B.M.I. bandwagon, turning the reports ? in casual parlance, obesity report cards ? into a new rite of childhood.

    Legislators in other states, including New York, have proposed them as well, while some individual school districts have adopted the practice.

    Here, in the rural Southern Tioga School District, the schools distribute the state-mandated reports even as they continue to serve funnel cakes and pizza for breakfast. Some students have physical education for only half the school year, even though 34 percent of kindergartners were overweight or at risk for it, according to 2003-4 reports.

    Even health authorities who support distributing students? scores worry about these inconsistent messages, saying they could result in eating disorders and social stigma, misinterpretation of numbers that experts say are confusing, and a sense of helplessness about high scores.

    ?It would be the height of irony if we successfully identified overweight kids through B.M.I. screening and notification while continuing to feed them atrocious quality meals and snacks, with limited if any opportunities for phys ed in school,? said Dr. David Ludwig, director of the Optimal Weight for Life program at Children?s Hospital Boston.

    The farmers and foundry workers here in north-central Pennsylvania have different ideas about weight than those of the medical authorities who set the standards (the percentiles are based on pre-1980 measurements because the current population of children is too heavy to use as a reference). Here, the local pizza chain is called Pudgie?s. Nearby Mansfield?s fanciest restaurant serves its grilled chicken salad piled with fries.

    Nearly 60 percent of eighth graders in the district scored in the 85th percentile or higher in 2003-4; more than a quarter had scores in the 95th percentile or higher, meaning they were officially overweight.

    As it is for adults, the body mass index for children is a ratio of height to weight, but the juvenile numbers are also classified by age and sex, and the word ?obese? is not used.

    Holly Berguson, the homecoming queen at North Penn Junior-Senior High School here, wears a size 20, a fact cited by her many admirers as proof of this community?s generous attitude toward weight, its proud indifference to the ?Baywatch? bodies on television.

    ?I don?t care how big I am,? said Holly, 17, who is insulin resistant, a condition that often precedes Type 2 diabetes. ?It?s not what you look like, it?s who you are.?

    Part of the rationale behind the reports is that they are an extension of the height and weight checks that schools have traditionally conducted.

    But here, the letters sent home with report cards have been a shock. Many parents threw them out, outraged to be told how much their children should weigh or unconvinced that children who look just fine by local standards are too large by official ones. Seventh graders traded scores during lunch periods. And more than a few children, like Karlind, no longer wanted to eat, students and parents said.

    This year, Pennsylvania requires body mass index notification for students in kindergarten through eighth grades. Holly will graduate before it is required at the high school next fall. Her confidence about her body ? she is a lifeguard and wears a bathing suit without embarrassment ? says something about how the perception of childhood obesity has changed from earlier generations.

    Among children, teasing and weight have always gone together, but now, says Doris Sargent, principal of Mansfield?s elementary school, there are so many overweight children that ?you can?t pick on everybody.? Here, two kinds of children are teased about their weight: the hugely fat and the thin.

    Children who are merely big ?pick on skinnier kids because they don?t like their own weight,? said Cassie Allen, a wiry ninth grader at Mansfield Junior-Senior High School who has been taunted as anorexic, as she and her friends sat over a lunch of brown-edged iceberg lettuce piled with artificial bacon bits and neat discs of chicken parmesan in the cafeteria.

    A few miles away, at North Penn Junior-Senior High School, a cluster of bleary-eyed girls gathered before the start of classes, complaining that the letters chided them for a situation they were helpless to fix.

    ?It would be different if we had something to do rather than eat,? said one, Shauna Gerow.

    On a recent school trip to New York, the girls felt like visitors from a different, chubbier planet, they said.

    ?They?re all this big,? said Cassie Chase, holding her arms close together, ?and we?re all this big,? she said, flinging them wide open.

    The letters made some recipients feel the same way but left them unsure what to do about it.

    Karen Sick, food services director for the school district, has been phasing in healthier foods despite budgetary obstacles and students who prefer white bread over whole wheat. The school district has revamped its menus, eliminating Gatorade and the powdered sugar from the funnel cakes. But it still sends a nutritionally mixed message: birthday cupcakes are discouraged while cafeterias sell ice cream sandwiches and Rice Krispie treats, which some students buy five at a time.

    The district?s cafeterias recently introduced kiwi and field greens, which drew enthusiastic reviews, but because of the high cost, they are now back to canned fruit and iceberg lettuce. Officials, while trying hard to address the concerns, acknowledge that change may take several more years.

    Along the same lines, all students receive some form of physical education each year. But some students live 45 minutes from school: by the time they get home, it is too dark and cold to play outside. And the administrators point out that many children with weight problems also need tutoring after school, so they have to choose between extra help and team sports.

    School administrators here say they do not have the resources of their counterparts in Arkansas, which slowed the rate of increase of its childhood obesity using money drawn from a state tobacco settlement windfall.

    Nor can they afford exotic gym fare like the Pilates and kayaking now offered in the Miami-Dade County Public Schools, where high school students who had scores in the 95th percentile and above have lost an average of eight pounds a semester.

    To successfully change students? eating habits, schools would need to counsel each child and provide ?really high-quality nutrition and physical activity assessments,? said Marlene Schwartz, director of research and school programs at the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale. ?How often are they eating fruits and vegetables? How much soda are they drinking??

    Christina Bov? is the mother of three children who attend the Blossburg schools. She clutched a picture of her 9-year-old son, Christian, in a bathing suit, to prove that he was not ?at risk of overweight,? as his 92nd percentile score had indicated.

    The letter was inaccurate ? and useless, Ms. Bov? said. ?The school provides us with this information with no education about how to use it or what it means,? she said.

    Ms. Bov? is more worried about her daughter Alora, age 8, who has lately taken up carrot sticks and constant weigh-ins. ?She walks out of the bathroom saying, ?I weigh 68 pounds, and none of you can say that,? ? Ms. Bov? said.

    For the kind of young woman who counts every kernel of no-butter popcorn, the index reports can be dangerous, some experts said.

    ?A letter from school feels evaluative,? said Kelly M. Vitousek, a professor of psychology at the University of Hawaii and a specialist in eating disorders. Declaring a weight healthy ?without knowing the background of how the kid got there, you?re affirming kids who have actively done something to suppress weight,? she said.

    The practice of reporting body mass index scores in schools has gone from pilot program to mass weigh-in despite ?no solid research? on either its physical or psychological impact, and ?no controlled randomized trial,? said Ms. Schwartz of Yale. ?Entire states are adopting a policy that has not been tested.?

    Individual school districts like Miami?s and New York City?s are issuing personalized fitness reports for students that list their abdominal crunches and the pace of their one-mile runs along with their body mass index scores.

    The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected soon to issue a policy statement on the reports, providing guidelines about their benefits and risks, an agency spokesperson said. Meanwhile, supporters of the reports said that some of the problems experienced here ? shocked parents, uncomfortable revelations ? are precisely the point.

    ?If families had an accurate perception of the issue, we wouldn?t need B.M.I. screening,? said Dr. Ludwig of Children?s Hospital Boston. ?There are so many overweight children that perceptions are getting distorted about what?s normal and healthy.?

    While the body mass index is not a perfect test, Dr. Ludwig said it is an effective, low-cost screening tool. He cited a 2005 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine that suggested the current generation of children might have shorter life expectancies than their parents.

    ?The consequences of childhood obesity,? he said, ?are too great to ignore.?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    Absolutely this is too simplistic. I think that it is important that children from a young age are aware of thier body size but taught at the same time that it is ok. The only way to fight the fights that need fighting is to arm kids at a young age with knowledge about going too far either way.
    But our society really prevents us from doing this in a safe way. How do we, as a skinny-valuing society, discourage both obesity and anorexia at the same time? We tell the kids not to be fat then worry about them when they obsess about it (rightfully so)... we tell them not to be thin, but advertise McDonalds super-size fries and it seems to them that obesity is the only alternative. It's like we as a society have eliminated the concept of a healthy "average weight".

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    37,170
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    That's my take, too. This strategy does two things:

    1. It stigmatizes anyone who departs from whatever someone somewhere has decided should be the "accepted norm" of the day and brands them as "abnormal".

    2. It focuses far too much attention on BMI and "non-average" weight -- which especially in children tends to be transient as they go through different growth stages anyway -- and in so doing is very likely to significantly increase the incidence of eating disorders and body dysmorphic disorder in susceptible individuals.

    It is, in my opinion, a simpleminded knee-jerk reaction to one problem which is almost guaranteed to create other problems while doing nothing to combat the issue of childhood "obesity". Forget about BMI report cards. Forget about branding children as obese or underwight. Focus on teaching them about the fundamentals of good nutrition instead.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    Just to put a different spin on this topic but I think is relevant, if a BMI report card goes to the parents to tell them whether or not their child is indeed within the "normal BMI range" I would be concerned that a parent wanting their child to be "perfect" or "normal" may go overboard upon hearing that they are not within the "normal range". This could lead to some unhealthy habits forced upon the child by the parent.

    The same can be said for the parent if they have or had struggle with any sort of eating/body issues. They may see their own past/or present feelings coming up for them and not want their own child going through what they have/are and therefore go overboard in various ways to try and protect/prevent them from experiencing them same things which again could lead to the teaching of unhealthy eating habits.

    Just my thoughts??

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    Personally, I don't think things like this should be brought up to children at all. How much is a child really going to understand about all this, and what the heck is he/she supposed to do about it? For the most part, what a child eats is decided at home. They get breakfast and dinner there. They get lunch at school. It's up to the school to provide healthy foods and not garbage. If those decisions are made correctly, there shouldn't be all that much to worry about.

    Now, the parents need to be responsible on their end, seeing that their children eat properly and get plenty of exercise. Parking the younguns in front of the TV/computer/video console to keep them out of one's hair is abdicating one's responsibility. The same goes for the school. If good, nutritious food is provided and there isn't another choice, the child will have to eat good, nutritious food. If he/she is taught well at home, that won't be a punishment.

    A child is a child. They shouldn't be worrying about their BMI, for Pete's sake!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    656
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    I agree TL,

    Food (diet) and excersize can be decided at home. Although I aggree with the healty eating and sports regimes at school,for parents; Playing games, soccer, trampulines, etc can be a fun way to spend time together anyway! Of course this is coming from someone with out kids. Lol.
    Last edited by ^^Phoenix^^; January 10th, 2007 at 11:03 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    A thought: it's ridiculous seeing this come out in a world where schools are no longer allowed to "fail" children and hold them back without parent permission, where the idea of "picking teams" in phys-ed has been questioned because of the impact of evaluation on a child's self esteem. And then they go and tell them they're too fat?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Going Overboard: Simplistic response does more harm than good

    Quote Originally Posted by Nancy View Post
    Just to put a different spin on this topic but I think is relevant, if a BMI report card goes to the parents to tell them whether or not their child is indeed within the "normal BMI range" I would be concerned that a parent wanting their child to be "perfect" or "normal" may go overboard upon hearing that they are not within the "normal range". This could lead to some unhealthy habits forced upon the child by the parent.

    The same can be said for the parent if they have or had struggle with any sort of eating/body issues. They may see their own past/or present feelings coming up for them and not want their own child going through what they have/are and therefore go overboard in various ways to try and protect/prevent them from experiencing them same things which again could lead to the teaching of unhealthy eating habits.

    Just my thoughts??
    I wholeheartedly agree here with you; I would worry about the numbers game in the minds of parents and the children alike. I think we need to increase physical activity in school... and have healthy cafeterias or have a Heathy-lunch only policy in the schools.
    **I am a believer that since most children are bused or go out of catchment to school...they are driven everywhere and don't walk everyday and this is one of the first of many reasons for childhood obesity. I have seen such a change in children over the last decade or so. Perhaps coincides with when parents starting driving and organizing their children's lives and not letting children just go out and play. The "loss" of the neighbourhood is such a sad thing and has such a negative effect on the health of our little ones. Ok, getting off my soapbox now.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Disclaimer: PsychLinks is not responsible for the content of posts or comments by forum members.

Additional Forum Web Design by PsychLinks
© All rights reserved.