More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Stigma as a Barrier to Mental Health Care
Observer Vol.27, No.8, October 2014

Despite the availability of effective evidence-based treatment, about 40% of individuals with serious mental illness do not receive care, and many who begin an intervention fail to complete it. A new report published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest investigates stigma as a significant barrier to care for many individuals with mental illness.

Although stigma is only one of many factors that may influence care seeking, it has profound effects for those who suffer from mental illness. In the report, Patrick W. Corrigan of the Illinois Institute of Technology and coauthors Benjamin G. Druss of Emory University and Deborah A. Perlick of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York synthesize the available scientific literature, identifying different types of stigma that can prevent individuals from accessing mental health care.

Public stigma emerges when pervasive stereotypes ? that people with mental illness are dangerous or unpredictable, for example ? lead to prejudice against those who suffer from mental illness. The desire to avoid public stigma causes individuals to drop out of treatment or avoid it entirely. Public stigma may also influence those closest to individuals with mental illness, including friends, family, and care providers.

Corrigan and colleagues note that stigma becomes structural when it pervades societal institutions and systems. The facts that mental health care is not covered by insurance to the same extent as other medical care and that mental health research is not funded at the same levels as medical research, are two clear indications that mental-illness stigma continues to exist at the structural level.

In the face of these realities, the report identifies approaches to addressing stigma that can help increase care seeking among those with mental illness. These approaches operate at various levels, from promoting personal stories of recovery and enhancing support systems to instituting public policy solutions that enhance systems of care.

?This issue of Psychological Science in the Public Interest makes a strong start in consolidating and disseminating what we now know ? that public policy, the law, and media remain our greatest resources to stimulate change and spur action,? former US First Lady Rosalynn Carter, Rebecca Palpant Shimkets, and Thomas H. Bornemann of the Carter Center Mental Health Program write in a commentary that accompanies the report. ?We also need to build bridges to other fields that connect to mental health, such as public health, primary care, and education.?


  • Psychological Science in the Public Interest-2014-Corrigan-37-70.pdf
    790 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:


Account Closed
I am afraid my comment may not belong to this post, but what matters in both medical and mental health research is not only the amount of money they receive, but how this money is being utilized.
There is one question hanging in my head : Do we need to pay for all IPads and IPhones of each and every physician who pretends to be involved in research. Do they work from they IPhones? No, no. The people I have seen use their PCs for work and IPads for movies. Half of the research money gets wasted anyway. Seen what they do in cancer research. Not that it helped I was crying every time when working on particular cancer floors.
There is also the stigma that can occur within the medical profession. I've been in the ER when I've witnessed patients being monitored by security guards or nurses wherein staff members talked about the"nut" case within earshot of others walking by. .That time, it wasn't me. Hwever, it happened to me twice. I will never forget it. There are things I do not mention if I have to visit the ER because I don't want the added attention or to have someone possibly over hear the conversation. It is too embarrassing.


Account Closed
Yes, unfortunately at some hospitals physician, nurses and even cleaning staff think they can discuss patients behind their backs. It is forbidden in every profession, as well as by policy and extremely unprofessional. I would break in such conversations and tell them that I do not want to learn details about patients that I am not assigned to or am not supposed to know, especially without their consent. See, if you have a celebrity in the hospital, like it happened recently where I work, they are very well aware and more careful. It is plain disrespect.
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.