More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Therapy online: Good as face to face?
By Elizabeth Landau, CNN
Mon August 31, 2009

Your therapist's name is ELIZA, and she interacts with you through text on a computer screen. However embarrassing or difficult your problem may be, ELIZA will not hesitate to ask you a question about it, or respond graciously, "That is very interesting. Why do you say that?"

Computer-based therapy has come a long way since ELIZA, a 1960s computer program designed to emulate (and parody) a therapist. Today, with the Internet, people can use the instant message format to communicate with real therapists.

A new study in The Lancet suggests that real-time chat therapy with a psychotherapist is successful in helping people with depression.

Participants were randomly assigned to either receive online cognitive behavioral therapy in addition to usual physician care -- which may include antidepressant medication -- or to continue their usual care and be placed on a waiting list. The intervention consisted of up to 10 55-minute sessions, five of which were expected to be completed by the four-month follow-up.

Of the 113 people who did online therapy, 38 percent recovered from depression after four months, compared with 24 percent of people in the control group. The benefits were maintained at eight months, with 42 percent of the online therapy group and 26 percent of the control group having recovered.

The level of benefit shown in the study is about the same as could be expected from traditional therapy, although the researchers did not compare the two as part of the experiment, said Dr. Gregory Simon, a psychiatrist and researcher at Group Health Cooperative in Seattle, Washington, who wrote the editorial that accompanied the study.

Experts say the Internet has enormous potential for psychotherapy, especially for reaching people who do not have access to in-person care.

"People may be more willing to talk about things that are embarrassing or stigmatizing if they're not interacting face to face" with a therapist, Simon said.

There is also evidence that writing about traumatic events may contribute to mental health, said Dr. David Kessler of the University of Bristol, United Kingdom, who was the lead author of the study. "We think that writing gives people time to pause and reflect, and that this may help the therapeutic process," he said in an e-mail.

Still, instant messaging has flaws -- therapists miss out on visual cues, gestures and speech intonations. Experts say it's probably not going to make in-office sessions obsolete.

"This is exactly the kind of study that we need to show that computerized and Internet-based psychotherapy can be effective, but that's a far cry from saying that this is going to replace psychotherapy," said Marlene Maheu, a psychologist in private practice in San Diego, California.

But there's plenty of room for both in-person and Internet-based psychotherapy, Kessler said.

Participants in the trial had already been screened by therapists before engaging in chat-based therapy, and had taken a written test to measure how depressed they were. "Careful evaluation is important using this medium as it is in any type of psychotherapy," Kessler said in an e-mail.

In a nonexperimental setting, however, practitioners offering online services may have difficulty screening faraway clients, Maheu said. This could lead to situations in which a psychotherapist gets sued because an online patient becomes violent or suicidal in a different state or country, she said.

Moreover, all psychotherapists must be licensed in the states in which they practice, and may unknowingly provide Internet treatment illegally to people who lie about their location, she said.

There are plenty of companies that advertise online therapy, but it is not seen as an alternative to traditional in-person psychotherapy, Simon said.

Besides instant messaging, other computer-based therapies require less or no interaction with a real therapist, he said. Like ELIZA, some are programs that operate without a therapist controlling them. Today, however, instead of just text, they may incorporate sophisticated graphics, video or the ability to create game-style avatars, he said. The cost of this to the patient would be much less than face-to-face therapy, but it's not clear whether it would be as effective, Simon said.

Another approach is more akin to e-mail, in which therapy takes place through messages between patient and therapist, but not in real time. This would also be less costly than in-person therapy because it would presumably require less time, Simon said. For a full live session over the Internet, the amount of time required is the same as an office session, so it may cost the same, or less, he said.

Generally, computer-based therapies are being marketed as stress management or employee assistance programs, Simon said.

Thomas Nagy, a psychologist in Palo Alto, California, said he has more confidence in therapy mediated by telephone or the Internet if the therapist and patient first meet face to face for evaluation and initial treatment.

Nagy has tried telephone therapy and video conferencing with patients whom he had already treated in his office, but who had moved away. Besides some technical difficulties with the video setup, he found it very much like a face-to-face meeting. But, essentially, "e-mail therapy is an oxymoron," he said.

Whether health insurance companies will cover Internet-based therapy will largely determine how popular it becomes, Simon said.

Maheu said that managed care companies have consulted her about Internet-based therapy, and that these companies are reluctant to incorporate these techniques because they have not yet been perfected. The funding for research in this field in the U.S. is mostly going toward video chat therapy, she said. The bugs that need to be addressed include improving the video quality so that therapists don't miss a split second of a patient's behavior, and sufficiently encrypting it so that the session is absolutely private.

"As soon as this is a reasonably sound mode of intervention, it's going to be integrated in health care," she said.
 

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Nagy has tried telephone therapy and video conferencing with patients whom he had already treated in his office, but who had moved away. Besides some technical difficulties with the video setup, he found it very much like a face-to-face meeting. But, essentially, "e-mail therapy is an oxymoron," he said.

When asked to respond to this statement, Email said, "Nagy is just a moron". Nagy appears to be not answering Email at present.
 

Ade

Member
I have been delivering online counselling/psychotherapy for some time as well as my traditional face to face method with voice communication with skype, I find that people with out a video link generally find it easier to talk about sexual matters or any subject they find embarrassing in a more open and relaxed way, I have even tried my hypnotherapy skills as an experiment online, the hypnotherapy delivery is rather problematic but that's more to do with the type of equipment used and my lack of visual ques, and its still on going.

I only use skype as that's very secure and the quality is now very good but I am just starting to try out dimdim as a way to deliver a new service to more than one person at a time, I am looking for volunteers to verify its effectiveness for some topics.

I don't use e-mail as its not a medium I am happy with at this time.

In my humble opinion online therapy is can be a very effective method to provide therapy at low cost and I have had some very good results that seem to have taken less time than I would have envisaged normally, more openness and honesty around personal feelings and emotions, but it does have its limitations, especially regarding people who are in crisis or feeling suicidal and for that reason I do not take on clients that I deem as unsuitable or at high risk.

:2thumbs:
 
Seems like it would, like face to face, depend on the therapists computer skills as well.

What do you do with a therapist who types slow or doesn't use a spell checker? What if there's a language barrier? Maybe the therapist isn't a native English speaker and speaking to a client who is. The therapist might use some phrase etc that doesn't 'translate' well.

Also, there are SO MANY cues that simply are not seen using the written word. Tone of voice, volume of voice, e.g. 'body language'. Even very good friends get into spats online because something read is misinterpreted and assumptions are made very rapidly. Then there is the issue of online security. What guarantees does the therapist have to prevent a seriously disturbed client from doing a 'copy/paste' of their words and 'sharing' them across the web? That's an almost impossible thing to prevent or predict.

If it's argued it would be good for people who just need an outlet or someone to 'vent' to, The Samaritans do the same thing and for free.

I could see it as an additional support to an existing traditional method in an already established relationship or for something 'quick and easy', but not for someone in need of serious psychotherapy.
 

Ade

Member
Seems like it would, like face to face, depend on the therapists computer skills as well.

What do you do with a therapist who types slow or doesn't use a spell checker? What if there's a language barrier? Maybe the therapist isn't a native English speaker and speaking to a client who is. The therapist might use some phrase etc that doesn't 'translate' well.

.

Quite simple find a new therapist there are plenty to chose from online


I agree with your view about typing out thoughts and feelings etc, but it may be helpful for some as that may be preferred medium for communication.
Don't forget that e-mail has its advantages too, you don't have to keep an appointment or you can take your time and respond when you feel able.
Regarding bad spelling and spell checking I would think that's a matter of professional and personal consideration.
And don't forget that online therapy includes other methods of communication.


I only use voice communications as I do not like the e-mail format for a number of reasons, some times I use video but its all dependent on what the client feels is best for them, video has its problems and for that reason I prefer to use just voice.

The main issue I have found with using video is the problem regarding eye contact, the camera is often positioned away from the screen or just at the top or sides and this can lead to what I call the autocue effect, you can tell the person speaking is not looking directly at you but looking at the camera, or they are looking at the image on the screen and this can be detected.this can unintentionally lead to the client thinking your not interested or feeling unable to engage with the therapist and unable to work out why.

Our subconscious is very good at picking up slight changes in peoples outward expressions of inner thoughts and feelings from very subtle changes in body language or other visual information we give out.
Its surprising how quickly we can detect when someone is not paying attention to what we say, looking bored or uninterested just by the way they act and look in our presence, a strong indicator is eye contact or the lack of it.

The way the camera can change the way your perceived can in some cases hinder the therapy process, this can be hard to detect no matter how clever you think you are at positioning the camera.
But as always its a personal choice and works for some, but by removing the camera its almost always a more personal service in my experience, that may seem strange to say but its surprising how fast you can pick up subtle changes in thinking or emotions just by listening, even a silence is never silent but is just another way of communication.

On one side its not going to be everyone's cup of tea, but on the other hand it can actually lead to faster results and help build the therapeutic relationship much faster than normal face to face therapy.
No matter if its e-mail or video or just voice communications its a personal choice as always, whats is right for one is not suited to another but does not mean that its no good at all.

So if it works it works well, if not then all you need to do is change to another method of receiving therapy, I never charge for the first session so the client loses no money, and can happily move on if unhappy with the online way of communication with out financial loss.
Some therapists online charge for the first session? how and why?:..........OK ill leave it there :D don't get me started on that one
:lol:
 

Nicki

Member
I think for many it would be alot easier online I dont like talking face to face as that involves the therapist looking at me. But then again as ive learnt it is hard to hide how you are feeling when talking face to face. Face to face seems harder and scarer but I think maybe it is better. But then again I think too much so who knows? :)
 
There's an old joke that says people who become therapists do so because they can't fix their own problems, so they go about trying to fix everyone else's. Maybe that's why they charge straight out of the gate.

I've seen an 'online psych' service and the dude didn't even put up his credentials! He just SAID he was a 'therapist'. Maybe that has something to do with online laws ( they can be slippery and slippery people tend to like that LOL ). I mean, put up the school you graduated from so I can check with the school that you were indeed a graduate of it, post your interships and WHERE so I can check on that too. Post any organizational articles you've contributed or books written etc etc. But some therapists seem to think they don't have to do that.

If I can't a check a doctors professional background, there's no way in the world I'm going to bother contacting them.

Your comments about webcams make sense and that's a great point to bring up IMHO.

I'm curious, and hope you don't mind me asking, what a free first consultation actually reveals, generally, for a potential client. It took me several months of sessions before I realized I was dealing with an unethical therapist so that leads me to think I could be that much more easily duped online or via phone. Anyway, anything I think about any of this is just my OPINION. And I'm fully aware of what the actual value of that is ;) ( especially lately! LOL ) I think if you're really helping people, the mechanical method is not necessarily THE most important component and I can understand the argument that some people might prefer the anonymity the web can afford.
 

Ade

Member
I'm curious, and hope you don't mind me asking, what a free first consultation actually reveals, generally, for a potential client. It took me several months of sessions before I realized I was dealing with an unethical therapist so that leads me to think I could be that much more easily duped online or via phone. Anyway, anything I think about any of this is just my OPINION. And I'm fully aware of what the actual value of that is ;) ( especially lately! LOL ) I think if you're really helping people, the mechanical method is not necessarily THE most important component and I can understand the argument that some people might prefer the anonymity the web can afford.

I don't mind at all :)

Why I don't charge for a first session some times called the initial consultation is based on the fact that no therapist can tell if they can help or even should try to help the client without first doing an assessment of the risks and check for any contra indicators, with out that its unethical in my opinion to charge for the session.

I don't deal with psychosis only neurosis I don't have the training or resources to help people who have a serious mental illness like schizophrenia so I need to asses the risks involved with taking on any client, and there are also ethical considerations to check such as the clients age or even if they are under the influence of drugs or alcohol among others, I am not saying we can't be fooled at the assessment stage but I have turned away a couple of clients over the years, also if I feel unsure or get that gut feeling that some thing is not right I also pass the client.

This first meeting also allows for the client to see if the therapist feels right for them, if they feel able to connect or if they feel understood and respected for who they are as people, does the therapist answer questions to their satisfaction and what ever else is important to them.

In my opinion I can't charge for a session when part of the reason for having the session in the first place is for my own ethical considerations, how can I charge a client money for doing whats ethically correct.

I get clients who ask me if I can help them or cure the anger issues or what the presenting problem is, and I have to say I can only try my best but its they who have to do the work and I can only act as a possible catalyst and work with them to try and find a way forward toward a possible change, I can not promise to help, and that is always the truth.

I am a therapist, I am not a doctor or a psychiatrist I can not dispense drugs, any counselor or psychotherapist does not have the training to do that, the exceptions are the health professionals like doctors who have also trained as therapists. if you pay to see a doctor or psychiatrist on the first session you will receive some sort of treatment or diagnosis, no person who has trained only in psychotherapy or Hypnotherapy can offer that kind of service with out spending some time assessing the possibilities and getting to know the client in my opinion.

I spent a year studying Hypnotherapy and two years studying psychotherapy/counseling but my training only takes me so far and does not make me a better therapist than the next one. the best part of the training for me was my tutor, I was lucky to have an exceptional teacher who showed me the difference between learning about therapy and becoming a therapist, I also discovered that my misguided idea that all therapists were like a band of people helping each other as they helped people so so wrong, its better described as total war, not using bullets but words and qualifications and associations to carve up the money pit or try and show them selves as the superior practitioners while crushing the dissenters underfoot. :eek:mg:

To some I will be a dissenter to be crushed :D

There's an old joke that says people who become therapists do so because they can't fix their own problems

There is some truth in that saying. the real problem is when we don't know we have an issue in the first place and unknowingly try to use the client as a sort of venue for our own issues, that's why therapists need to enter therapy themselves.

As a therapist I have my own opinions about the world of therapy and this is my opinion, another therapist will have another view or opinion, and on it goes.:D
 
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.
Top