Thought – for a normal person, a thought is a thought. That is, a thought is the persons thought (his or her thought; not someone else – that is “saying” the thought), and says something. The meaning is in the meaning of what the thought says. OK, so a mentally ill person is having thoughts that in some way are different for the normal. One of the main issues is that the thought is identifying some person (incorrectly), as well as being by “someone” <else>. Ok, so a lot of the thought problem is about identity, or say person based. A thought for a normal person possibly doesn’t say that, first of all, someone “else” says “this” thought. So Ok, the identity from the start is different. So, it is weighted differently. Say someone is a very religious person, and his thoughts were coming from a person that is a “serial killer” – his thoughts would be weighted differently (seemingly?) than to his “real” Self. In this explanation, the form is misplaced – people term Absolute (illusions based identity, value sense – false witness – terms people “shadow of” –spirit- absolute). Another example; a police officer who is working in the drug policing section – so just say he was having his thoughts from a drug lord, a drug dealer, a drug user, a prostitute, and a killer. So as his thoughts are received, they seem weighted, and of a different “self” to his self. This is based on a lot of things, and is just an example of principle to explain the concept (principle) of the Schizophrenic mental illness.
OK, from the above examples, the identity of the thoughts can be considered in opposition of the morality of the person’s experience of Self (Self is “Me=you”; versus “Other”), or in some sense “weighted”. The “other” is termed absolute (but weighted – false witness; identity issues), as is the “you”, but “me” is in shadow. OK, so the “you” is termed absolute, but the sense of “me” is in shadow, but the shadow (sense of “me”) is constrained, and projected in sense of “you”. That is, our morality and values, says through or of shadow (hidden), and projected onto “you”, but in the real sense, symbolic of the “other”. The terms Self is “me-you”, but the extreme is of the “other”. The “other” in real sense is the bad guy. With our understanding of Psyche; me-you, in some sense is understood as a form of relating. But the “other” is outside of this – the “other” being “not of us”, an outsider, a person that doesn’t belong, and is “bad” and is not good. “Me-you” is the form of relating for people. When the “you” sense terms of the “other”, there is opposition and judgement of incompatibility, and of “not-being”. The “other” does not belong to “us”, and is thwarted as the “criminal sense” of bad person. This is of the shadow sense of “me”.
Ok, our morality is transposed of Self, which leads of “me”, but projected of “you”. The “me” is hidden, and is of sense the projected “shadow” part, but is also significant of virtue. The “me” is not known, since being inherently “empty”. We can not “stay” or “fix” knowledge of our divinity. What we see of the “you” can be considered “absolute”, but hence, the workings of the unfolding of Self, all of sense is surrendered (“me” or terms “you”), into the terms absolute, the trans-self (the Self being both me and you); or of communion (key terms third – spirit; “trans-self). Because our nature is inherently empty, some “quality”, or some form of identity, or value, or morality is binding; and irrelevant. And what we see of the other person (you) is actually projected; of our Self – a hidden projected sense of “me”, onto “you”, the other,. Also the “you” terms absolute (of relativities of relativities), in the sense of Spirit or our God sense (the third; of absolute). So our medium, of sense relating, is perspective based, value, morality, love and hate; and sense of relativities of relativities. The Self is me projected onto you, qualified by the “other” (the “other” term or sense is the work of the Schizophrenic).
The issue of the “other” is difficult. While the “me” is hidden and projected; the Self consisting of me-you, entails spirit and shadow. So the Self (me-you) is given to another you (the other – termed versus “third” – absolute versus the identity of false witness; God versus bad person) in a sense of Self transformation (the “me” part). But the “other” is another degree. The “other”, in some sense is not part of the communication (in essence communion) of the Self (me-you). The “other” is of another so-called “outsider” or opposing group. This is explained above (police-drug lord) – different perspective, relative “position” (opposing), morality, understanding, and judgement (being “wrong” or “bad”) and so called “evil?” (Opposition). Ok, so the schizophrenic brain tends her reach, or context of, to, or from, the “other”. OK, so the schizophrenic can realise the “me-you”, but the thoughts are always termed of the “other”. In that sense, Ok we can relate to another person; that person may be “different”, and we may not necessarily agree with them, but as supposed as what we hate “being” of our Self’s identity, values, good-bad, societies love-hate, etc. The person relating is you, and is seen “other” as not belonging, and not of “our” values, loves and likes. The “other” is not like us, and is not of communion (communication, like, love) of the “me-you” (Self being me-you). Remember, the “you” terms absolute, the Spirit sense. We are unconscious of our own divinity, unless awakened, hence reverent of the “you” as divine, eternal and of the Spirit, of God sense. The “me” is actually our shadow sense. As for awareness of our divinity, the “you”, as from origin (Adam Eve) for man is the woman, thee, of the eternal, Mother. For man’s love of the feminine, the principle of the eternal mother terms absolute, the God sense, the eternal.
The “other” is the “third” principle. The third terms absolute, but in real sense the “other” terms the forth. The Planet Earth is of the key of D, the 4. The Self terms 4, in sense the reality. People grounded in “so-called” reality have the surface text of some so-called “virtual” perspective sense of some called multi-dimensional so-called “reality”. Ok, we have “good”, and we have “bad”. Ok, most would say wealth is good (virtue positive – good). Ok we all could be considered to aspire to wealth. Ok, so as terms destructive action upon our Earth, and/or “people” is considered “good”, or “positive” (though not truth, nor in long term, positive), we go along with it, though the Spirit will know it is destructive and not sustainable (which terms absolute truth, regardless of opinion and/or “so-called reality”) this is the thread of opinion based perspective based on the apparent perspective of wealth, and economical based sense of wealth creation. Ok wealth for people is linked to money, and in essence terms power. In our life, we have “control”, and we have “controlled”. The Ego is the issue. As termed the “other”, the other terms the D, or the forth, the so-called reality. Now reality is relative, of relativity of relativity. As with emotion, the person perceives reflection upon some “so-called” reality that may be truth (relative) and the shadow sense (not known, me-sense, projected), or an undercurrent that is pre-existing some form of pre form of transgression, or judgement, or misunderstanding . The “emotion” terms the difference from “relative of relativities reality”, to the “sense” to the, through shadow projected “other”, to the absolute. This is the transformation of Self – the redeemed me, through the reverence of the other (me-you-both termed absolute, though verses of the “other”). The emotion terms reflection of some “relative” perspective based on some pre-existing relative sense of pre existent relative so-called reality (double perspective based, “me” in shadow). The reality of the “word” is pre existent. Say the word n*****, or black, or ****, or **** – these words have meaning, negative connotations. Ok, why do these words have negative(s). They have transgression, and false witness, and in essence destructive false sense of ignorant realities – pertaining to past misunderstandings and fear. Ok, so through this “burden” (apparent discrimination, false witness), the schizophrenic tends through thought (of the “other”), to heal and redeem through the sense of “other” (weighted; sense not us) to the principle of third (absolute term; trans Me-You; transformation of Self).
Grouping. OK, listening to radio or TV – The bloke is talking about a “group” that is bad, or a country, or a “type” person. This is saying that these bad people are “other”; that is, not us. So this is perspective based, value(s) based, right/wrong based, morality based; saying these “group” or “country” or “religion” or “people” are other or opposed, or against. This is the “other”. This is the difference between a hated, spurned group or individual; and the term absolute – that is, God, the Third principle (communion).
OK, from the above examples, the identity of the thoughts can be considered in opposition of the morality of the person’s experience of Self (Self is “Me=you”; versus “Other”), or in some sense “weighted”. The “other” is termed absolute (but weighted – false witness; identity issues), as is the “you”, but “me” is in shadow. OK, so the “you” is termed absolute, but the sense of “me” is in shadow, but the shadow (sense of “me”) is constrained, and projected in sense of “you”. That is, our morality and values, says through or of shadow (hidden), and projected onto “you”, but in the real sense, symbolic of the “other”. The terms Self is “me-you”, but the extreme is of the “other”. The “other” in real sense is the bad guy. With our understanding of Psyche; me-you, in some sense is understood as a form of relating. But the “other” is outside of this – the “other” being “not of us”, an outsider, a person that doesn’t belong, and is “bad” and is not good. “Me-you” is the form of relating for people. When the “you” sense terms of the “other”, there is opposition and judgement of incompatibility, and of “not-being”. The “other” does not belong to “us”, and is thwarted as the “criminal sense” of bad person. This is of the shadow sense of “me”.
Ok, our morality is transposed of Self, which leads of “me”, but projected of “you”. The “me” is hidden, and is of sense the projected “shadow” part, but is also significant of virtue. The “me” is not known, since being inherently “empty”. We can not “stay” or “fix” knowledge of our divinity. What we see of the “you” can be considered “absolute”, but hence, the workings of the unfolding of Self, all of sense is surrendered (“me” or terms “you”), into the terms absolute, the trans-self (the Self being both me and you); or of communion (key terms third – spirit; “trans-self). Because our nature is inherently empty, some “quality”, or some form of identity, or value, or morality is binding; and irrelevant. And what we see of the other person (you) is actually projected; of our Self – a hidden projected sense of “me”, onto “you”, the other,. Also the “you” terms absolute (of relativities of relativities), in the sense of Spirit or our God sense (the third; of absolute). So our medium, of sense relating, is perspective based, value, morality, love and hate; and sense of relativities of relativities. The Self is me projected onto you, qualified by the “other” (the “other” term or sense is the work of the Schizophrenic).
The issue of the “other” is difficult. While the “me” is hidden and projected; the Self consisting of me-you, entails spirit and shadow. So the Self (me-you) is given to another you (the other – termed versus “third” – absolute versus the identity of false witness; God versus bad person) in a sense of Self transformation (the “me” part). But the “other” is another degree. The “other”, in some sense is not part of the communication (in essence communion) of the Self (me-you). The “other” is of another so-called “outsider” or opposing group. This is explained above (police-drug lord) – different perspective, relative “position” (opposing), morality, understanding, and judgement (being “wrong” or “bad”) and so called “evil?” (Opposition). Ok, so the schizophrenic brain tends her reach, or context of, to, or from, the “other”. OK, so the schizophrenic can realise the “me-you”, but the thoughts are always termed of the “other”. In that sense, Ok we can relate to another person; that person may be “different”, and we may not necessarily agree with them, but as supposed as what we hate “being” of our Self’s identity, values, good-bad, societies love-hate, etc. The person relating is you, and is seen “other” as not belonging, and not of “our” values, loves and likes. The “other” is not like us, and is not of communion (communication, like, love) of the “me-you” (Self being me-you). Remember, the “you” terms absolute, the Spirit sense. We are unconscious of our own divinity, unless awakened, hence reverent of the “you” as divine, eternal and of the Spirit, of God sense. The “me” is actually our shadow sense. As for awareness of our divinity, the “you”, as from origin (Adam Eve) for man is the woman, thee, of the eternal, Mother. For man’s love of the feminine, the principle of the eternal mother terms absolute, the God sense, the eternal.
The “other” is the “third” principle. The third terms absolute, but in real sense the “other” terms the forth. The Planet Earth is of the key of D, the 4. The Self terms 4, in sense the reality. People grounded in “so-called” reality have the surface text of some so-called “virtual” perspective sense of some called multi-dimensional so-called “reality”. Ok, we have “good”, and we have “bad”. Ok, most would say wealth is good (virtue positive – good). Ok we all could be considered to aspire to wealth. Ok, so as terms destructive action upon our Earth, and/or “people” is considered “good”, or “positive” (though not truth, nor in long term, positive), we go along with it, though the Spirit will know it is destructive and not sustainable (which terms absolute truth, regardless of opinion and/or “so-called reality”) this is the thread of opinion based perspective based on the apparent perspective of wealth, and economical based sense of wealth creation. Ok wealth for people is linked to money, and in essence terms power. In our life, we have “control”, and we have “controlled”. The Ego is the issue. As termed the “other”, the other terms the D, or the forth, the so-called reality. Now reality is relative, of relativity of relativity. As with emotion, the person perceives reflection upon some “so-called” reality that may be truth (relative) and the shadow sense (not known, me-sense, projected), or an undercurrent that is pre-existing some form of pre form of transgression, or judgement, or misunderstanding . The “emotion” terms the difference from “relative of relativities reality”, to the “sense” to the, through shadow projected “other”, to the absolute. This is the transformation of Self – the redeemed me, through the reverence of the other (me-you-both termed absolute, though verses of the “other”). The emotion terms reflection of some “relative” perspective based on some pre-existing relative sense of pre existent relative so-called reality (double perspective based, “me” in shadow). The reality of the “word” is pre existent. Say the word n*****, or black, or ****, or **** – these words have meaning, negative connotations. Ok, why do these words have negative(s). They have transgression, and false witness, and in essence destructive false sense of ignorant realities – pertaining to past misunderstandings and fear. Ok, so through this “burden” (apparent discrimination, false witness), the schizophrenic tends through thought (of the “other”), to heal and redeem through the sense of “other” (weighted; sense not us) to the principle of third (absolute term; trans Me-You; transformation of Self).
Grouping. OK, listening to radio or TV – The bloke is talking about a “group” that is bad, or a country, or a “type” person. This is saying that these bad people are “other”; that is, not us. So this is perspective based, value(s) based, right/wrong based, morality based; saying these “group” or “country” or “religion” or “people” are other or opposed, or against. This is the “other”. This is the difference between a hated, spurned group or individual; and the term absolute – that is, God, the Third principle (communion).
