More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Nature is in its worst shape in human history, UN report says
CBC News
May 06, 2019

'This is really our last chance to address all of that,' godfather of biodiversity says

cache.php

The United Nations issued its first comprehensive global scientific report on biodiversity, which explored the threat of extinction for Earth's plants and animals. (Ben Curtis, File/Associated Press)

Nature is in more trouble now than at any other time in human history, with extinction looming over one million species of plants and animals, scientists said Monday in the UN's first comprehensive report on biodiversity.

It's all because of humans, but it's not too late to fix the problem, the report by the United Nations says.

Species loss is accelerating to a rate tens or hundreds of times faster than in the past, the report said. More than half a million species on land "have insufficient habitat for long-term survival" and are likely to go extinct, many within decades, unless their habitats are restored. The oceans are not any better off.

"Humanity unwittingly is attempting to throttle the living planet and humanity's own future," said George Mason University biologist Thomas Lovejoy, who has been called the godfather of biodiversity for his research. He was not part of the report.

"The biological diversity of this planet has been really hammered, and this is really our last chance to address all of that," Lovejoy said.

Conservation scientists from around the world convened in Paris to issue the report, which exceeded 1,000 pages. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) included more than 450 researchers who used 15,000 scientific and government reports. The report's summary had to be approved by representatives of all 109 nations.

Some nations hit harder by the losses, like small island countries, wanted more in the report. Others, such as the United States, were cautious in the language they sought, but agreed "we're in trouble," said Rebecca Shaw, chief scientist for the World Wildlife Fund, who observed the final negotiations.
"This is the strongest call we've seen for reversing the trends on the loss of nature."

The findings are not just about saving plants and animals, but about preserving a world that's becoming harder for humans to live in, said Robert Watson, a former top NASA and British scientist who headed the report.

"We are indeed threatening the potential food security, water security, human health and social fabric" of humanity, Watson told The Associated Press. He said the poor in less developed countries bear the greatest burden.

'Business as usual is a disaster'
The report's 39-page summary highlighted five ways people are reducing biodiversity:

  • Turning forests, grasslands and other areas into farms, cities and other developments. The habitat loss leaves plants and animals homeless. About three-quarters of Earth's land, two-thirds of its oceans and 85 per cent of crucial wetlands have been severely altered or lost, making it harder for species to survive, the report said.
  • Overfishing the world's oceans. A third of the world's fish stocks are overfished.
  • Permitting climate change from the burning of fossil fuels to make it too hot, wet or dry for some species to survive. Almost half of the world's land mammals — not including bats — and nearly a quarter of the birds have already had their habitats hit hard by global warming.
  • Polluting land and water. Every year, 300 to 400 million tons of heavy metals, solvents and toxic sludge are dumped into the world's waters.
  • Allowing invasive species to crowd out native plants and animals. The number of invasive alien species per country has risen 70 per cent since 1970, with one species of bacteria threatening nearly 400 amphibian species.
Fighting climate change and saving species are equally important, the report said, and working on both environmental problems should go hand in hand. Both problems exacerbate each other because a warmer world means fewer species, and a less biodiverse world means fewer trees and plants to remove heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the air, Lovejoy said.

The world's coral reefs are a perfect example of where climate change and species loss intersect. If the world warms another 0.5 degrees Celsius, which other reports say is likely, coral reefs will probably dwindle by 70 to 90 per cent, the report said. At 1 degree Celsius, the report said, 99 per cent of the world's coral will be in trouble.

"Business as usual is a disaster," Watson said.

cache.php

Coral reefs, pictured surrounding a small island on the Great Barrier Reef, are a perfect example of where climate change and species loss intersect according to the report. (David Gray, File/Reuters)

At least 680 species with backbones have already gone extinct since 1600. The report said 559 domesticated breeds of mammals used for food have disappeared. More than 40 per cent of the world's amphibian species, more than one-third of the marine mammals and nearly one-third of sharks and fish are threatened with extinction.

The report relies heavily on research by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which is composed of biologists who maintain a list of threatened species.

The IUCN calculated in March that 27,159 species are threatened, endangered or extinct in the wild out of nearly 100,000 species biologists examined in depth. That includes 1,223 mammal species, 1,492 bird species and 2,341 fish species. Nearly half the threatened species are plants.

Scientists have only examined a small fraction of the estimated eight million species on Earth.

The report comes up with one million species in trouble by extrapolating the IUCN's 25 per cent threatened rate to the rest of the world's species and using a lower rate for the estimated 5.5 million species of insects, Watson said.

Outside scientists, such as Lovejoy and others, said that's a reasonable assessment.

Habitat loss among biggest threats
The report gives only a generic "within decades" timeframe for species loss because it is dependent on many variables, including taking the problem seriously, which can reduce the severity of the projections, Watson said.

"We're in the middle of the sixth great extinction crisis, but it's happening in slow motion," said Conservation International and University of California Santa Barbara ecologist Lee Hannah, who was not part of the report.

Five times in the past, Earth has undergone mass extinctions where much of life on Earth blinked out, like the one that killed the dinosaurs. Watson said the report was careful not to call what's going on now as a sixth big die-off because current levels don't come close to the 75 per cent level in past mass extinctions.

cache.php

The report said one of the five major ways people are reducing biodiversity includes turning forests, like the Amazon rain forest in Brazil, into developments like soybean farms. (Paulo Whitaker, File/Reuters)

The report goes beyond species. Of the 18 measured ways nature helps humans, it said 14 are declining, with food and energy production noticeable exceptions. The report found downward trends in nature's ability to provide clean air and water, good soil and other essentials.

Habitat loss is one of the biggest threats, and it's happening worldwide, Watson said. The report projects 25 million kilometres of new roads will be paved over nature between now and 2050, most in the developing world.

Many of the worst effects can be prevented by changing the way we grow food, produce energy, deal with climate change and dispose of waste, the report said. That involves concerted action by governments, companies and people.

Individuals can help with simple changes to the way they eat and use energy, said the co-chairman of the report, ecological scientist Josef Settele of the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research in Germany. That doesn't mean becoming a vegetarian or vegan, but balancing meat, vegetables and fruit, and walking and biking more, Watson said.

"We can actually feed all the coming billions of people without destroying another inch of nature," Lovejoy said. Much of that can be done by eliminating food waste and being more efficient, he said.
 

Bumblebean

Member
I have been on an environment rant since I was 12, having experienced horrific pollution first hand. Acid rain, clear-cut logging, and learning that gold is processed with arsenic (i havent worn gold since). I knew things were bad, i knew we had to act, but i never imagined i would see this extreme consequence. I feel so helpless (and angry I feel as if my heart has been torn right out of me :(
��
 

Daniel E.

daniel@psychlinks.ca
Administrator
I have thought about getting solar power eventually since it is so popular here in Arizona. The upfront cost is why more people don't do it.

But one of the "benefits" of not being rich: Less carbon footprint. Much press was made about Al Gore's private jetting around.
 

Bumblebean

Member
I have thought about getting solar power eventually since it is so popular here in Arizona. The upfront cost is why more people don't do it.

So true. Some very well-off person nearby built a house so energy-efficient it takes no power off the grid but puts power on it. My dream house, though far too large for my needs. It cost millions to build ... i reckon a closet-sized version would be too rich for my blood. I guess it's going to take a long time before costs go down, but the only way that happens is if sales and services increase significantly.
I'm a low-impact consumer overall, but unfortunately I live in a rental that's about 40 years behind the times. It's helped me get creative, though that's getting hard on the ancient chassis �� Plastic bags are hard to avoid altogether, but a couple of winters ago I found a way to repurpose them .... no matter how beat up they are, they're great for stuffing into drafty gaps:D
The frustrating part is that while we "ordinary" folk can knock ourselves out trying to do our bit, until the big polluters/rape-and-pillagers get the message, the current state of affairs won't change. As long as the big macho trucks (I love trucks! But even if I could afford one I wouldn't buy one :( ) are being manufactured and powered by fossil fuels, there will be people buying them, not only for work but for recreation. Hearing people talk about"mud-bogging"(e.g.) does interesting things to my blood pressure :mad:
Ahhh ... I could rant for a week, so this is as good a time as any for me to shut up. For now ;)

�� :hippy:
 
Been collecting skids to burn at side of roads and to reuse for their wood for building.
Some of the skids are made of oak, maple, beautiful wood . also have underground heating when it works it has to be fixed this summer.

I always have had reusable grocery bags. Husband bought some solar panels a few small ones from Canadian tire been bugging him to get them up and working lol He has had them for a few years now.

I am actually trying to grow my own vegetable this summer not good at it but it is worth try. Little things but if each of us did those little things car pooling ect it does help. It is the big manufacturers that have to listen and start changing their ways before it is too late to do anything. some signs of change like eliminating plastics wraps straws lids bags ets are happening but not fast enough i think.
 

Daniel E.

daniel@psychlinks.ca
Administrator
We need to talk about climate change, even if it's depressing | Aeon Essays

Delve deeper into people’s life stories and experiences and it becomes clear why lists such as ‘Top 10 tips for a cleaner planet’ are frequently dropped straight into the bin. Simplistic demands for changes in behaviour take no account of the complexity of people’s feelings about climate change or the way in which behaviour is locked into social structures and expectations...

It might feel like too much to be both a good mother and a responsible environmental citizen.
 
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.
Top