More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Fresh doubt cast on memories of abuse recovered in therapy
Monday, August 13, 2007

Memories of child abuse, long buried, but suddenly recovered in therapy, have been a source of controversy for some time now. The fear is that such memories are false; that they are the product of suggestion, hypnosis, visualisation or other therapeutic technique.

Now Elke Geraerts and colleagues have cast fresh doubt on the reliability of these therapy-recovered memories. They found that such memories are dramatically less likely to be corroborated by third parties or other evidence, than are lost memories of child abuse recovered outside of therapy, or abuse memories that were never forgotten.

Seventy-one participants with never-forgotten memories of child abuse, and 57 participants with recovered memories responded to a newspaper advert posted by the researchers. They were interviewed in detail about possible corroborating evidence for their abuse, such as a third party who learned about the abuse soon after it happened, or another person who reported having been abused by the same alleged perpetrator.

Significant corroborating evidence was found for 45 per cent of the 71 participants who had never forgotten their memory of having been abused, and 37 per cent of the 41 participants who, at some point outside of therapy, had recovered a lost memory of being abused. But in dramatic contrast, corroborating evidence wasn't found for any of the 16 participants who recovered their memories of abuse in therapy.

And yet the groups didn't differ on many variables that might explain this difference in evidence, such as age when abused, severity of abuse, or how much they talked about the abuse with others. In fact, the only difference between the recovered-memory groups, aside from the amount of corroborating evidence, was that the participants who recovered their memories in therapy were less surprised by their newly discovered memories.

The researchers said their findings offered support for both sides of the recovered memory debate. While memories recovered in therapy appeared to be false, the corroborating evidence for memories recovered outside of therapy suggested that some discontinuous memories can be genuine.

Source: Geraerts, E., Schooler, J.W., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Hauer, B.J.A. & Ambadar, Z. (2007). The reality of recovered memories. Corroborating continuous and discontinuous memories of childhood sexual abuse. Psychological Science, 18, 564-568. :acrobat:


My memories were there before I started therapy. Imprinted deeply on my psyche like the scars they are. Because they are real. My past is real. And sometimes I wish it wasn't.

One of the criteria for Complex PTSD is amnesia or hyperamnesia [sp?] for traumatic events. I'm one of those with hyper-acute memory. The trouble is with connecting with the feelings that I buried. I buried feelings, not memories, to survive. Connecting with my feelings is a main part of my therapy work. Painful, but helpful.


Account Closed
I have always had memories but I couldn't put 2 and 2 together until therapy this past year. I didn't understand how serious the abuse was and the seriousness of the effect on me.


David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
My memories were there before I started therapy. Imprinted deeply on my psyche like the scars they are. Because they are real.

This article isn't about situations like yours at all, braveheart.

Rather, it's about the difficulties inherent in memories that are "recovered" during therapy. The issue is not even about whether people can repress memories that later emerge during therapy. It's more about the need for skill in the therapist to avoid implanting suggestions of abuse or trauma that never existed (there have been a few notorious examples of this). Sometimes, memories do spontaneously resurface during therapy - the key is for the therapist NOT to play an active role in "retrieving" them which may contaminate the "memory" (false memory syndrome) to the point where the patient is adamantly and sometimes irreversibly convinced of the accuracy of those memories even when collaborative sources are all very clearly saying the memory is false.


Thanks David.

I just get kind of defensive and self-protective when anything triggers feelings of not being believed in. It's part of the .. whole thing .. with me. Thanks again.
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.