What on earth does this mean, Philosophically!
A problem or social encounter ends up with someone making the statement that one over thinks things.
My view on this is, who determines what over thinking is, where are the boundaries on a topic and who or what sets them, they appear to be arbitrary dependent on the agenda or ability for the recipient to follow the topics course. If they are unwilling or unable to follow a point to its rational or logical conclusion they impart some arbitrary point at which they accuse the other of over thinking as some form of closure or as a defence mechanism.
I note, individuals are often quite happy to make some form of reason or rational for their view, standpoint, or perspective on a situation, but when challenged with a more in-depth analysis of their rational or logic they often retreat to an arbitrary stance, making comments like ?I am not going to discuss with you, or, you over think things?. A more accurate statement to make in my opinion would be, I am unwilling to explore this further, or, I cannot give the time for further discussion. In which case why enter into an explanation for something in the first place. Why not just say ?you cannot say, or do this or that due to rules or regulations or boundaries which are out of my control, which are not open to me for discussion or change, should you even be correct?.
A problem then arises accepting the above is broadly correct or accurate. In so much as we are social individuals who are part of complex social systems, if these social norm?s and values are distorted, corrupted, or incomplete where does it leave the individual who is attempting to make sense of this accepted value set knowing it?s imperfections, and inadequacies. It is argued we as individuals need to accept the rationale, logic, reasons, and accuracy of things before we can align ourselves to things, anything, if we feel it?s flawed, or incorrect it?s very difficult to place genuine cohesion to a group?s value set. We become an unwilling participant in danger of becoming marginalised and excluded. Further to this, it is argued such an individual often marginalises themselves, excludes themselves from social groups and situations and can become a hermit. This only fuels a further disconnection from society and also serves to highlight any of the personality differences as the individual develops an ever disconnected mind set from the social norms and values of the rest. Not uncommon the psychology profession will recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for such situations. But again, it is argued, from the recipient?s perspective, they are mealy attempting to get them to accept the social norms and values of and ever increasing corrupt, inadequate social set of values, which due to their ability of being able to investigate at a deeper level reveals the deceptions and contradictions of the society. Therefore, again they are unwilling to agree and accept the rationale being sold to them. These are sometimes the misfits of society, those unwilling or unable to participate or be apart of the normal working and social life. But one thing for sure is it does not make them wrong or inadequate. What do we do with these sorts of individuals?
Further to this, we have not examined the potential outcome of the above like depression, anger, and other conditions which could arise as a result of the disconnectedness of the individual. This only further exacerbates their feeling of disconnectedness from the rest of society.
A problem or social encounter ends up with someone making the statement that one over thinks things.
My view on this is, who determines what over thinking is, where are the boundaries on a topic and who or what sets them, they appear to be arbitrary dependent on the agenda or ability for the recipient to follow the topics course. If they are unwilling or unable to follow a point to its rational or logical conclusion they impart some arbitrary point at which they accuse the other of over thinking as some form of closure or as a defence mechanism.
I note, individuals are often quite happy to make some form of reason or rational for their view, standpoint, or perspective on a situation, but when challenged with a more in-depth analysis of their rational or logic they often retreat to an arbitrary stance, making comments like ?I am not going to discuss with you, or, you over think things?. A more accurate statement to make in my opinion would be, I am unwilling to explore this further, or, I cannot give the time for further discussion. In which case why enter into an explanation for something in the first place. Why not just say ?you cannot say, or do this or that due to rules or regulations or boundaries which are out of my control, which are not open to me for discussion or change, should you even be correct?.
A problem then arises accepting the above is broadly correct or accurate. In so much as we are social individuals who are part of complex social systems, if these social norm?s and values are distorted, corrupted, or incomplete where does it leave the individual who is attempting to make sense of this accepted value set knowing it?s imperfections, and inadequacies. It is argued we as individuals need to accept the rationale, logic, reasons, and accuracy of things before we can align ourselves to things, anything, if we feel it?s flawed, or incorrect it?s very difficult to place genuine cohesion to a group?s value set. We become an unwilling participant in danger of becoming marginalised and excluded. Further to this, it is argued such an individual often marginalises themselves, excludes themselves from social groups and situations and can become a hermit. This only fuels a further disconnection from society and also serves to highlight any of the personality differences as the individual develops an ever disconnected mind set from the social norms and values of the rest. Not uncommon the psychology profession will recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for such situations. But again, it is argued, from the recipient?s perspective, they are mealy attempting to get them to accept the social norms and values of and ever increasing corrupt, inadequate social set of values, which due to their ability of being able to investigate at a deeper level reveals the deceptions and contradictions of the society. Therefore, again they are unwilling to agree and accept the rationale being sold to them. These are sometimes the misfits of society, those unwilling or unable to participate or be apart of the normal working and social life. But one thing for sure is it does not make them wrong or inadequate. What do we do with these sorts of individuals?
Further to this, we have not examined the potential outcome of the above like depression, anger, and other conditions which could arise as a result of the disconnectedness of the individual. This only further exacerbates their feeling of disconnectedness from the rest of society.