David Baxter PhD
Late Founder
Study finds evidence of obesity stigma
Katherine Zeratsky, R.D., Mayo Clinic
September 5, 2008
I need to state right up front that it is not my intent to offend anyone. Instead, I share my thoughts in the spirit of openness and concern. I also hope that by doing so that each of you who decides to respond will also share your views in a caring and constructive fashion.
There is an interesting study in the July 2008 International Journal of Obesity whose objective was to develop a tool that would measure and compare biases that we all have to varying degrees.
A clarification is called for here. "Bias" according to my on-line thesaurus is also known as: prejudice, partiality, unfairness, preconceived notion, foregone conclusion. The study also is up front in stating that they use the terms bias and prejudice interchangeably.
What? We all have prejudice? Sure we do ? and to varying degrees. I personally have a strong bias against violence. We all have preconceptions and both tolerance and intolerance for any number of issues. These feelings can be weak or strong.
This study developed a tool that could be used to measure bias, and to also rank biases from being a strong bias relative to others that are weaker. The three targets of bias that were chosen to measure and compare were: obesity, homosexuality, and Muslims. Why did they choose these targets? The authors chose these three because each are widely known minority groups ? and like it or not, they are documented targets of discrimination.
What emerged was that that there was strongest prejudice against obesity, followed next by bias against homosexuals, and then against Muslims. (If you wish to see the statistical details and strengths of the rankings you may access the using the link below.)
Laws and other protective policies have been put into place over the years to discourage ? even punish ? discrimination against race, gender, sexual orientation, and religion. It is pointed out that there is widespread documented evidence of weight bias in employment, educational, interpersonal ? and yes ? in medical settings. However unlike these other targets, no laws or protective policies are in place to discourage or punish bias against obesity.
The study concludes that weight bias is significantly stronger than bias against homosexuals and Muslims. It also concludes that much more research is needed in the area of prejudice and its causes and solutions.
For now, at the least, don't you think social advocacy is needed to decrease the disproportionate attitude ? and acceptance ? of bias toward obese individuals? The authors ? and I ? applaud the efforts and progress made in protecting other minority groups against prejudice and discrimination. And, I also agree with the authors that "it is unacceptable that the obesity stigma is still so pervasive, strong and under recognized."
What are your feelings?
Katherine Zeratsky, R.D., Mayo Clinic
September 5, 2008
I need to state right up front that it is not my intent to offend anyone. Instead, I share my thoughts in the spirit of openness and concern. I also hope that by doing so that each of you who decides to respond will also share your views in a caring and constructive fashion.
There is an interesting study in the July 2008 International Journal of Obesity whose objective was to develop a tool that would measure and compare biases that we all have to varying degrees.
A clarification is called for here. "Bias" according to my on-line thesaurus is also known as: prejudice, partiality, unfairness, preconceived notion, foregone conclusion. The study also is up front in stating that they use the terms bias and prejudice interchangeably.
What? We all have prejudice? Sure we do ? and to varying degrees. I personally have a strong bias against violence. We all have preconceptions and both tolerance and intolerance for any number of issues. These feelings can be weak or strong.
This study developed a tool that could be used to measure bias, and to also rank biases from being a strong bias relative to others that are weaker. The three targets of bias that were chosen to measure and compare were: obesity, homosexuality, and Muslims. Why did they choose these targets? The authors chose these three because each are widely known minority groups ? and like it or not, they are documented targets of discrimination.
What emerged was that that there was strongest prejudice against obesity, followed next by bias against homosexuals, and then against Muslims. (If you wish to see the statistical details and strengths of the rankings you may access the using the link below.)
Laws and other protective policies have been put into place over the years to discourage ? even punish ? discrimination against race, gender, sexual orientation, and religion. It is pointed out that there is widespread documented evidence of weight bias in employment, educational, interpersonal ? and yes ? in medical settings. However unlike these other targets, no laws or protective policies are in place to discourage or punish bias against obesity.
The study concludes that weight bias is significantly stronger than bias against homosexuals and Muslims. It also concludes that much more research is needed in the area of prejudice and its causes and solutions.
For now, at the least, don't you think social advocacy is needed to decrease the disproportionate attitude ? and acceptance ? of bias toward obese individuals? The authors ? and I ? applaud the efforts and progress made in protecting other minority groups against prejudice and discrimination. And, I also agree with the authors that "it is unacceptable that the obesity stigma is still so pervasive, strong and under recognized."
What are your feelings?