It seems that labels are becoming more and more prevalent in their use. Whether it's to describe someone's mental illness ("he's bipolar", "he's schizo", "he's crazy"), or a physical illness (lazy (think: chronic fatigue), fat (think: thyroid, hormones, arthritis, early pregnancy, actually losing weight but still overweight), or sexuality (gay, lesbo, bi,)...we tend to either attach labels to others or very frequently have labels attached to us.
A few months ago I attended a job interview and ran into a co-worker from a few years ago from the same company who was also being interviewed for re-hire (we both got the job - yay!). I had met up with a friend and when I saw this co-worker I asked my friend "oh who is that? I know I worked with her years ago" and the answer I got was "I can't remember her name but I know she's gay." This got me thinking about labels...would we ever say "I can't remember her name but I know she's hetero"?
Do labels serve a productive purpose? Is it easier to identify segments of society with them? Why do we need to identify those segments when there isn't a clear purpose? In my job, there is a clear purpose to identifying people with physical or mental disabilities, but I only refer to their disability if it's completely relevant to the situation and not as a general label of the person. Why do gay and lesbian people "come out" thereby attaching the label to themselves, but "heteros" (if I'm going to label a group) don't? Is it more about acceptance and less about labels? Are the two correlated?
I'd be interested in hearing other people's input on this. I know how hugely labels have affected me in my own life, both to my benefit and extreme detriment, and may share that further in the thread.
Thoughts?
A few months ago I attended a job interview and ran into a co-worker from a few years ago from the same company who was also being interviewed for re-hire (we both got the job - yay!). I had met up with a friend and when I saw this co-worker I asked my friend "oh who is that? I know I worked with her years ago" and the answer I got was "I can't remember her name but I know she's gay." This got me thinking about labels...would we ever say "I can't remember her name but I know she's hetero"?
Do labels serve a productive purpose? Is it easier to identify segments of society with them? Why do we need to identify those segments when there isn't a clear purpose? In my job, there is a clear purpose to identifying people with physical or mental disabilities, but I only refer to their disability if it's completely relevant to the situation and not as a general label of the person. Why do gay and lesbian people "come out" thereby attaching the label to themselves, but "heteros" (if I'm going to label a group) don't? Is it more about acceptance and less about labels? Are the two correlated?
I'd be interested in hearing other people's input on this. I know how hugely labels have affected me in my own life, both to my benefit and extreme detriment, and may share that further in the thread.
Thoughts?