I have been given a question involving the person versus situation debate, if anyone can offer any help it would be greatly appreciated;
What emperical findings gave rise to the 'person versus situation debate'? What assumptions about personality and about situations reinforced these arguments? How does the interactionist approach redefine the problem?
What emperical findings gave rise to the 'person versus situation debate'? What assumptions about personality and about situations reinforced these arguments? How does the interactionist approach redefine the problem?
