More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Spanking Produces Troubled Kids, Study Contends
By Madonna Behen, Doctor's Lounge
February 06, 2012

Punishment linked to more aggression in children, two decades of research shows

Adding more fuel to the controversial topic of children and spanking, two Canadian child development experts have published a new analysis that warns that physical punishment poses serious risks to a child's long-term development.

In the paper, published online Feb. 6 in CMAJ, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the authors analyzed two decades of research and concluded that "virtually without exception, these studies found that physical punishment was associated with higher levels of aggression against parents, siblings, peers and spouses."

While studies show that spanking has declined in the United States since the 1970s, many parents still believe it's an acceptable form of punishment. A 2010 University of North Carolina study revealed that nearly 80 percent of preschool children in the United States are spanked.

"Our paper is a prompt to medical professionals to apply the compelling findings of research on physical punishment in their guidance of parents," said co-author Joan Durrant, a child clinical psychologist and professor of family social sciences at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg.

In addition to the substantial evidence that children who are spanked are more aggressive, the authors note that physical punishment is linked to various mental health problems, including anxiety, depression, and drug and alcohol abuse. What's more, recent neuroimaging studies have shown that physical punishment may alter parts of the brain that are linked to performance on IQ tests and increase vulnerability to drug or alcohol dependence, they write.

Many parents are skeptical of published findings on spanking, and question whether the aggressive behavior prompts the spanking, rather than the other way around. But the paper's co-author says researchers have been able to tease this relationship apart.

"It is the case that children who are more aggressive do tend to get hit more, but the punishment does not reduce those children's aggression; rather, it exacerbates it," said Ron Ensom, who worked as a social worker at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, in Ottawa, when the paper was written.

"When parents of aggressive children are instructed in how to reduce their use of spanking, and they do indeed reduce it, the level of their children's aggression declines," Ensom said. "And when children who all have the same level of aggression when the study begins are followed over a period of years, those who are spanked tend to get more aggressive over time, while those who are not spanked tend to get less aggressive."

The authors urged physicians to help parents learn nonviolent, effective approaches to discipline, but one child psychologist in the United States said the paper fell short in providing examples of such approaches.

"They did a nice job of summarizing all of the research, and it's always good to reinforce the message, especially to newer physicians," said Mary Alvord, a child clinical psychologist in private practice in Rockville and Silver Spring, Md. "I just wish they had taken the next step and given the doctors more tools to show parents what to do, rather than focusing so much on what they shouldn't do."

"Parents often feel helpless in these situations, and they want their child to get the message that what they did is wrong," Alvord said. "So I don't get preachy with parents, but I try to explain that there are so many more effective things that parents can do, like timeouts."

More information
The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests effective ways to discipline children.

SOURCES: Joan Durrant, Ph.D., professor, Department of Family Social Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; Ron Ensom, MSW, RSW, formerly of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa; Mary K. Alvord, Ph.D., Alvord, Baker & Associates, Rockville and Silver Spring, Md.; Feb. 6, 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal
 

Xelebes

Member
Hm, parents are led to believe ― either from tradition or community ― that aversive techniques are best to prevent certain behaviours, but are left with the inability to account for and respond to other behaviours that develop in response. Seems to be what I'm getting from this article.
 

Karri

Member
This makes alot of sense if you honestly think about it. Sure, the biggest con is that there isn't much offered in the form of alternative approaches. It has always seemed to me that consistency is the most important part of teaching a child anything. If you really think about it, that is the primary approach we use when training our pets. Every guide you read tells you to be consistent. It becomes difficult when raising a child to always be consistent especially when you have 2 parents with different approaches to parenting. Then you factor in grandparents, other relatives, child care providers etc. I always found with my children that a consistent approach to what was expected and what was deemed inappropriate was the best tool in teaching them and offering a pattern of discipline. Was I always effective? Heck no! Some days it was easier to say, ok you can you use the computer for an hour instead of hearing the whining. I saw that my children responded better to limitations and punishments that withdrew a toy or a privledge rather than physical correction. I grew up in an enviroment where the physical punishment came alot sooner than others. I know for myself it promoted more anger and defiance than anything else. I didn't want to do the same thing with my own children. I wasn't physically abused by any means. My mother was of the mindset that a slap in the mouth for backtalk or the "paddle" that hung on the wall were typical ways to punish a child. I know they didn't teach me anything but fear, anger and frustration. I wanted my children to learn. Believe me Im not saying that I have the answers or that I didn't make plenty of mistakes. Just saying, I do agree that physical punishment to me is not the answer. It only seems to cause more problems in the long term. It seems so much more effective when you teach them however that may be. Cause and effect, consequences for actions, what ever you want to call it. We all have to live by rules and that is something we can never get away from no matter where we go or what we do. It is the same with children.
 
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.
Top