More threads by David Baxter PhD

David Baxter PhD

Late Founder
Treatment for addicts is starting to change
By Shari Roan, Los Angeles Times
September 22, 2012

Experts are pushing for a truly medical approach to treating addiction as a disease rather than relying solely on longtime unproven therapies like 12-step programs.

A call for change is afoot in the difficult and often heartbreaking world of addiction treatment.

For decades, 12-step programs and a medication-free approach have dominated the recovery industry. But now doctors and scientists and the leader of the National Institute on Drug Abuse are pushing for broad recognition of addiction as a disease and more medical approaches to therapy.

In the last couple of years, a top addiction society officially declared addiction a "brain disorder." A specialty substance-abuse training program for doctors has been ushered into medical schools. The federal government has announced the creation of new resources to help guide patients, families and doctors toward science-based addiction treatment, and more drugs to treat addiction are entering the pipeline.

In June, Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy and President Obama's top advisor on drug policy, declared in a speech at the Betty Ford Center in Rancho Mirage that addiction "is not a moral failing on the part of the individual. It's a chronic disease of the brain that can be treated."

About 21 million Americans have a substance-abuse disorder for which they need specialty treatment, according to 2010 statistics from the government-funded National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Deaths from drug overdoses now exceed traffic fatalities.

Nine out of 10 people addicted to drugs other than nicotine receive no treatment, and most of those who do get it are put through unproven programs run by people without medical training, according to a 500-plus-page report released by Columbia University in June. Solid data on effectiveness of the most popular recovery approach ? 12-step programs ? are lacking, the report said.

Much of the reason for the disconnect is rooted in the recovery movement's history: Addicts, shunned by the medical establishment, received their help from those outside of it, a trend that continues to this day.

"Drug abuse treatment developed outside mainstream medicine," said Dr. Walter Ling, a leading addiction specialist at UCLA. "We're still suffering from that."

And yet decades of basic laboratory science has revealed that addiction is a bone fide medical problem involving profound brain alterations. Alcohol, opiates, cocaine and other substances increase levels of the chemical dopamine in the reward pathway of the brain. With repeated use, baseline dopamine levels wane to compensate and a drug becomes less pleasurable, requiring ever-larger doses.

Even when people are weaned from a drug, their brains don't return to normal. So they remain vulnerable to its draw, suffering mood swings and profound urges to use again.

Such discoveries are filling science journals at a prodigious rate, adding weight to the position taken by National Institute on Drug Abuse chief Dr. Nora Volkow ? that addiction is a chronic disorder that will require multiple rounds of therapy to reduce the risk of relapse and to lengthen drug-free intervals.

Several drugs to treat addictions have been approved in recent years, adding to the modest collection already in limited use, such as methadone for heroin addiction, Antabuse for alcoholism and a handful of others.

To Volkow's mind, the new medications are important for two reasons. First, recovery from addiction is hard and patients need every tool that medicine can offer them. But there is another potential benefit: The growing availability of medical treatments will encourage doctors to treat their patients' drug problems, just as they would a patient's out-of-control blood sugar or high cholesterol.

"You are killing two birds with one stone ? giving tools to improve outcomes for the patient and giving tools to the physician, increasing the likelihood they will incorporate substance abuse disorders into their practice," she said.

One of the most important new developments has been the emergence of long-acting drugs to reduce cravings that persist even in people who are highly committed to abstinence. Freeing addicts from summoning the willpower to take their medications each day ? as well as the temptation to sell them on the street ? eases their burden in the challenging first months of recovery, Ling said.

The medication naltrexone, a pill to treat alcohol dependence, was reformulated into a monthly injection called Vivitrol in 2006 and was approved for opioid addiction in 2010. In studies, 36% of the opioid-addicted patients on Vivitrol were able to stay in a treatment program for the full six months, compared with 23% of the patients receiving a placebo injection. That is a significant improvement for addiction, experts said.

Titan Pharmaceuticals of South San Francisco plans to seek Food and Drug Administration approval of an implant that would provide continuous delivery of the drug buprenorphine ? known as Suboxone in its pill form ? for six months to people attempting recovery from dependence on heroin or prescription painkillers.

In advanced studies led by UCLA's Ling, nearly 66% of patients who had the implant inserted under the skin in the upper arm stuck with treatment, compared with only 31% of those who received a placebo implant. They had higher rates of clean urine tests and lower rates of withdrawal symptoms and cravings.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse is also putting considerable effort into developing vaccines to fight addiction to nicotine, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine, Volkow said. The aim is to trigger an immune response to a drug of abuse so it can't reach the brain and elicit a "high," causing cravings for the drug to erode over time.

The move to treat addiction as a disease may receive a boost from the Affordable Care Act, which mandates treatment for substance abuse disorders and is likely to push services away from nonmedical treatment centers toward mainstream medicine, a Medicare official wrote last year in the journal Health Affairs.

But many U.S. drug treatment centers shun medications, or offer them only sparingly.

A 2011 survey of 345 directors of drug treatment centers in the Journal of Addiction Medicine found little interest in medications: Among programs with access to a medical doctor, fewer than half had adopted all available addiction treatments. Despite the availability of three prescription drugs approved to treat alcoholism, only 24% said they offered them.

Medications don't address the lifestyle, relationship and spiritual problems that lie at the heart of addiction, said John Schwarzlose, president and chief executive of the Betty Ford Center, one of the oldest and most highly regarded inpatient treatment facilities.

"That's why the Betty Ford Center has the 12-step program as the core philosophy," said Schwarzlose, who added that doctors at his center prescribe addiction medications on a case-by-case basis.

Volkow said she wasn't proposing that behavioral, psychosocial and spiritual approaches be kicked out of treatment programs ? only that the best that science can offer be thrown at this highly intractable problem.

"Addiction is a very aggressive disease," she said. "We need to treat it aggressively. We do that for other diseases."
 

GDPR

GDPR
Member
When I first read about suboxone, it sounded like a 'cure-all' for my sons addiction to heroin and oxycontin. Since he had no health coverage,my husband and I used our entire savings sending him to a treatment facility so he could detox and start the subs. Things went great,for awhile.

We quickly realized that it wasn't what we had all hoped for and expected. The pills were like $8 each,and he was prescribed 4 per day. Do the math...it adds up quickly. Not to mention the cost of visiting the doctor to have prescriptions refilled, the drug testing done at each visit, and the required attendance in substance abuse classes,which also had a fee.

We spent alot of money and alot of time just to realize they get addicted to the suboxone. They experience withdrawals from them too if not taken. So they resort to drug usage when the suboxone isn't available. Nobody warns you of that ahead of time.

It's not a cure-all,I'm not even sure it's a good thing at all. It's just substituting one drug for another. The only difference is the doctor becomes their dealer. And it's legal.
 

GDPR

GDPR
Member
The Vivitrol monthly injection is finally available where I live.It seems very promising,and one of my sons has been receiving it for a couple of months.

He seems to be doing well on it,the bad thing about it though is towards the end of the month it doesn't seem as effective.It is also hard to find a pharmacy that carries it,being such a small town they claim it's 'inappropriate' for them to have it at all( makes them look bad?).

He doesn't have to make the daily decision to either take suboxone or use,which was always a hard thing for him,he gets the shot,it lasts a month and that decision to use or not is out of his hands.
 

bunnyo

Member
I am someone who deal with food addiction issues but not drug or alcohol addictions. Friends of mine have been addicted to crack-cocaine, prescription narcotics, heroin - in BC methadone is considered a "cure" but many of these people will tell you that methadone is more addictive that what they were on before. It's just a money-making "legal" addiction.

One of my closest friends has been clean from crack & alcohol for 14 years and from marijuana for 10 years. She's still working on cigarettes but plans to conquer that soon. We actually met at a Christian 12 step for any type of Recovery. It's really changed my life. I still attend mental health classes and I am learning tools that way, but I am also using the 12 step along with the 8 beatitudes. It's work and you have to be willing to do that work. It's not a "miracle" cure - it's a get into the trenches and dig deep. Get to the root of what is the cause of your addictions in the first place. Heal those and it's easier to deal with the addictions.

I hope that's okay to say here on the forum seeing as I am pretty new... didn't mean to step on anyone's toes...
 

Daniel E.

daniel@psychlinks.ca
Administrator
The Science of Choice in Addiction - The Atlantic

...“Severe addiction may narrow people’s focus and reduce their ability to take pleasure in non-drug experiences, but it does not turn them into people who cannot react to a variety of incentives.” Although addictions are hard to break, it is most useful to view the potential for overcoming them through the lens of choice. It’s not a matter of just saying no—recovery requires far more grit and conviction than that—but it is very much a matter of regarding addicts as people who can rationally choose to use opportunities to their advantage, and working to provide those opportunities.
 
Replying is not possible. This forum is only available as an archive.
Top