Frustration and Discomfort Intolerance: Introduction to the Special Issue
by Neil Harrington
January 2011
Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
It has been suggested, that in 50 years’ time, Albert Ellis may be remembered most for the concept of low frustration tolerance (LFT). If so, this special issue [Frustration and Discomfort Intolerance] can be considered a fitting tribute to the wide influence Albert Ellis has exerted upon psychotherapy over the past half century...
Quite simply, frustrating events do not invariably lead to psychological disturbance. Rather, as Ellis argued, it is our beliefs about frustration that are central to psychological disturbance: the belief that frustrating or discomforting events absolutely must not exist and cannot be tolerated. Other cognitive-behavioral models, such as Beck’s Cognitive Therapy, also emphasized the importance of our appraisal of events, but focused more on beliefs related to self-esteem. Likewise, emotion regulation theories have suggested it is threats to self-esteem that are often central to self-control failure: with aversive self-awareness prompting a switch in priorities from long term goals to the relief of immediate emotional distress.
However, Ellis theorized that psychological disturbance arises, not only from threats to self-worth (ego disturbance), but also from intolerance of discomfort (discomfort disturbance). Such discomfort not only refers to negative emotions, but includes effort, everyday hassles, and a range of other frustrating events). The alternative to frustration intolerance is the acceptance of reality, whilst retaining the desire for change. Other therapies in recent years have also emphasized the importance of acceptance. Thus, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) has focused on distress tolerance, particularly in regard to borderline personality disorder. Similarly, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), has argued that psychological disturbance arises in large part from counterproductive control strategies resulting in experiential avoidance...
by Neil Harrington
January 2011
Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
It has been suggested, that in 50 years’ time, Albert Ellis may be remembered most for the concept of low frustration tolerance (LFT). If so, this special issue [Frustration and Discomfort Intolerance] can be considered a fitting tribute to the wide influence Albert Ellis has exerted upon psychotherapy over the past half century...
Quite simply, frustrating events do not invariably lead to psychological disturbance. Rather, as Ellis argued, it is our beliefs about frustration that are central to psychological disturbance: the belief that frustrating or discomforting events absolutely must not exist and cannot be tolerated. Other cognitive-behavioral models, such as Beck’s Cognitive Therapy, also emphasized the importance of our appraisal of events, but focused more on beliefs related to self-esteem. Likewise, emotion regulation theories have suggested it is threats to self-esteem that are often central to self-control failure: with aversive self-awareness prompting a switch in priorities from long term goals to the relief of immediate emotional distress.
However, Ellis theorized that psychological disturbance arises, not only from threats to self-worth (ego disturbance), but also from intolerance of discomfort (discomfort disturbance). Such discomfort not only refers to negative emotions, but includes effort, everyday hassles, and a range of other frustrating events). The alternative to frustration intolerance is the acceptance of reality, whilst retaining the desire for change. Other therapies in recent years have also emphasized the importance of acceptance. Thus, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) has focused on distress tolerance, particularly in regard to borderline personality disorder. Similarly, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), has argued that psychological disturbance arises in large part from counterproductive control strategies resulting in experiential avoidance...