I know I struggle with assertiveness but I don't think between session comms with my psych is anything I have any leeway to be assertive about. Other than reinforcing my boundary that since he won't reply, I won't send anything.
But you didn't call or text him this time, so how do you know he would not respond to that?
In other words, that seems like another "yeah, but..." rationalization:
It's not bad enough that I'd need to text or call about it. Not just for this.
If I'm annoying then he'll decide he doesn't want me as a client anymore.
The Yeah-But-Worry Diet: Are You On It?
“Yeah but what if…”
Worry is so second nature to me and going to my yeah-buts is an automatic reflex, I need a strategy that purposely and methodically momentarily draws my attention towards the positive.
Rationalization (psychology) - Wikipedia
Some rationalizations take the form of a comparison...
- "At least [what occurred] is not as bad as [a worse outcome]."
- In response to an accusation: "At least I didn't [worse action than accused action]."
- As a form of false choice: "Doing [undesirable action] is a lot better than [a worse action]."
- In response to unfair or abusive behaviour: "I must have done something wrong if they treat me like this."
False dilemma - Wikipedia
Common phrases expressing similar or synonymous concepts include:
- bifurcation fallacy
- black-or-white fallacy
- denying a conjunct (similar to a false dichotomy: see Formal fallacy § Denying a conjunct)
- double bind
- either/or fallacy
- fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses
- fallacy of the excluded middle
- fallacy of the false alternative
- false binary
- false choice
- false dichotomy
- invalid disjunction
- no middle ground
Last edited: